<< First Page
Type 3 Noun Suffixes: Qualification
The three kinds of Type 3 noun suffix fulfill the same function as Type 6 verb suffixes - they qualify the noun they follow. The three Type 3 suffixes are -Hey apparent, -na' definite and -qoq so-called.
-na' apparent
Like the Type 6 verb suffix -law' apparently, the Type 3 noun suffix -na' qualifies a noun as something apparent - the speaker has a doubt that what is seen is what is actually there.
paq | a book |
paqHey | an apparent book |
maS | moon |
maSHey | apparent moon |
baS | metal |
baSHey | apparent metal |
taSman | ditch (New word - taSman ditch (n)) |
taSmanHey | apparent ditch |
mutlhwI' | builder (New word - mutlh build, construct (v)) |
mutlhwI'Hey | apparent builder |
nuH | weapon |
nuHHey | apparent weapon |
HoS Hal | power source |
HoS HalHey | apparent power source |
Examples:-
pa' maSHey tu' nochmey | Sensors detecting an apparent moon over there |
Qav 'oSwI'Hey wIHoHnIS | We must kill the apparent representative last |
DaH tu'HomI'raHHeyvetlh yIpolHa' | Get rid of that apparently useless object now!/ (new word - tu'HomI'raH useless thing) |
veQHey 'oH Dochvetlh'e' | That is apparent garbage |
Apparent versus Apparently
It might be necessary, some days, to determine whether to use the noun suffix -Hey to qualify a noun, or the verb suffix -law' on a verb. -Hey only qualifies the noun it is attached to; -law' on the verb has the effect of an adverbial, and it affects the entire sentence.If you are using -law' and -Hey in the same sentence, you could translate the noun modified with -Hey with something like "what looks like" or "what could be" instead of a redundant apparent. Conversely, you could translate -law' as seemingly instead:-
pa' maSHey tu'law' nochmey | Sensors are apparently detecting what looks like a moon over there |
'oSwI'Hey wIHoHlaw'ta' | We have apparently killed what could be the emissary |
veQHey wIpolHa'law' | We have seemingly got rid of the apparent garbage |
No comments:
Post a Comment
DaH yIjatlh! Speak now!